Xylem Learning’s petition raised concerns about the provision of OMR sheets to students. Senior Advocate R. Basant, representing Xylem Learning, argued that some students had not received their OMR sheets. The NTA’s lawyer countered by stating that the OMR sheets had been uploaded and made available to all candidates.
The Supreme Court questioned the involvement of the coaching centre in filing the petition, noting that such institutions typically do not play a role in these matters. Nonetheless, the court sought the NTA’s response and scheduled a detailed hearing for July 8, alongside other related pleas.
Numerous students and educational institutions have approached the Supreme Court and various High Courts, alleging paper leaks, irregularities, and malpractices in the NEET-UG exam. A joint petition by ten students has requested a CBI and ED investigation into these allegations. They have also sought expedited action from the Bihar Police regarding their ongoing investigation.
Despite these controversies, the Supreme Court recently refused to delay the NEET-UG 2024 counselling process, scheduled to start on July 6. The court emphasized that the issue is complex and requires thorough consideration. The court also stayed proceedings on related pleas in various State High Courts, consolidating them for a hearing on July 8.
In a recent development, the NTA informed the Supreme Court that the scorecards of 1,563 candidates who received grace marks in the NEET-UG 2024 exam would be canceled. These students will have the option to retake the exam. The NTA has established a committee to review the results of these candidates and address any discrepancies.
The NEET-UG exam, conducted by the NTA, is the gateway for admission into MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, and other related courses in government and private institutions across India.
