In a strong stance against the practice of ‘bulldozer justice,’ the Supreme Court on Monday declared that properties cannot be demolished solely because they belong to individuals accused of crimes. Addressing a series of pleas challenging the demolition of houses linked to those accused of serious offenses, the court emphasized that such actions are not permissible, even if the person is convicted.
A bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan highlighted that demolishing properties without following the due process of law is unacceptable. The court stressed the need for legal procedures to be adhered to, regardless of the accused’s status.
However, the Supreme Court clarified that it will not extend protection to illegal structures that obstruct public roads. The bench also indicated its intent to establish nationwide guidelines to address the concerns surrounding demolition actions.
“Even in cases of conviction, demolition cannot proceed without adhering to the legal procedures,” the bench stated, underscoring the importance of safeguarding the rights of individuals, even when accused or convicted of crimes.
