What the media reported
According to press accounts published on October 30, 2025, the victim was an IIT Madras and IIM Ahmedabad graduate who suffered a brain haemorrhage on September 18, 2025. After her death, her distraught father called an ambulance and later tried to complete necessary police and civic formalities. The report alleges that he was asked to pay money at each step to the ambulance driver, to police personnel for FIR and post-mortem copies, to crematorium staff, and to municipal officials for a death certificate.
If these allegations are confirmed, the NHRC says they could amount to serious violations of human rights, including the right to dignity and protection from corrupt, inhuman or degrading treatment when a family is in mourning.
The NHRC has formally issued notices to the Chief Secretary of Karnataka and to the Director General of Police, Karnataka. The commission has requested a detailed, factual report on the incident within 14 days. The report request seeks clarification on the sequence of events, actions taken by the police and civic bodies, and any remedial steps or disciplinary proceedings initiated.
The move follows the NHRC’s mandate to intervene where news reports point to systemic or individual violations of human rights and where urgent administrative responses are necessary.
Allegations: step-by-step
Reportedly, the ambulance driver allegedly overcharged for services at the very outset. When the father sought the FIR and post-mortem report from police authorities, copies were provided only after money changed hands, the report claims. The family also donated the deceased’s eyes, but the crematorium staff reportedly demanded payment before allowing the cremation or related formalities.
Finally, the Mahadevapura municipal office reportedly delayed issuing the death certificate; the certificate was issued only after the father paid a bribe despite intervention by a senior officer, the reports state.
Human rights and governance concerns
Civil society and legal experts say the allegations, if true, highlight two linked problems: corruption in essential public services and the erosion of dignity for bereaved citizens. Human rights bodies argue that public officials must ensure that families can complete last rites and documentation free from extortion and harassment.
The NHRC’s notice is meant to trigger fact-finding and accountability. It may also recommend corrective measures, including departmental inquiries, criminal investigation where warranted, and system reforms to prevent recurrence.
What authorities must now do
Karnataka officials are expected to respond to the NHRC’s notice with a timeline of actions taken, copies of any inquiries ordered, and institutional measures to curb corrupt practices at emergency, police and civic service levels. The police will also need to clarify procedures for handing over FIRs and post-mortem documents to grieving families.
The NHRC can monitor the follow-up and, if necessary, pass recommendations or directions aimed at remedying violations and preventing similar incidents.