July 28, 2025 | New Delhi: A stormy debate rocked the Lok Sabha today as Operation Sindoor took center stage during the Monsoon Session of Parliament. With sharp questions from the Opposition and a strong defense by the government, the discourse highlighted India’s internal political pulse over its external defense posture.
What Is Operation Sindoor?
Operation Sindoor was India’s military response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, 2025, which claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government described it as a limited yet effective military operation targeting nine key terrorist hubs in Pakistan-occupied territory. Over 100 terrorists, including senior Lashkar-e-Taiba commanders, were neutralized.
The operation was hailed initially as a show of India’s military precision. But its sudden halt led to rising questions from the Opposition about strategic clarity and intent.
Congress Deputy Leader Gaurav Gogoi made an emotional intervention in the Lok Sabha, questioning the abrupt ceasefire. “If Pakistan was ready to kneel, why did we stop? Whom did we surrender to?” he asked, citing former US President Donald Trump’s claim that he “forced” both nations to cease fire.
Gogoi questioned the government’s narrative, saying, “If Operation Sindoor was a success, why is the Chief of Defence Staff on record saying our jets missed their targets and had to adjust? Why didn’t we go deeper and recover Pakistan-occupied Kashmir?”
Government’s Response: “We Achieved Our Goals”
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh responded with resolve. He emphasized that Operation Sindoor was not just about military action but national resolve. “We killed terrorists in their homes. Our objectives—military and political—were achieved. There was no pressure to halt the operation,” he asserted.
He also made a veiled dig at previous governments, saying, “After 26/11, there was talk. Under PM Modi’s leadership, India doesn’t just talk—it retaliates.”
INDIA Bloc Piles On Pressure
The INDIA alliance stepped up its attack, with MPs like Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deepender Hooda, and Saptagiri Ulaka slated to speak in upcoming sessions. TMC’s Kalyan Banerjee echoed the sentiment: “We’re not worried about lost jets. We want to know why you stopped. We stand with you on Kashmir—bring it back.”
Meanwhile, DMK MP Tiruchi Siva criticized the government’s silence over the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar, calling it a threat to democracy.
Diplomatic Front: A Tale of Two Nations
Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu of the TDP, who participated in diplomatic outreach post-Op Sindoor, offered a contrasting picture. “India gave the world non-violence and Gandhi. Pakistan gave Osama Bin Laden. The world sided with us not by chance, but due to EAM Jaishankar’s relentless diplomacy,” he declared.
What Lies Ahead?
Rajnath Singh hinted that Operation Sindoor isn’t over—it’s merely paused. “Any future misadventure by Pakistan will see the operation resume,” he warned. He underlined India’s defensive posture, saying, “We extended a hand of peace. But if that hand is betrayed, we know how to twist the wrist.”
The nation now awaits Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s expected address in Parliament tomorrow. With mounting scrutiny, the Modi government faces increasing pressure to explain not just its military moves, but also its political motives behind halting the strikes.
Key Takeaways
- Operation Sindoor was a counter-attack after the Pahalgam terror strike.
- Over 100 terrorists were killed in a coordinated tri-services strike.
- The sudden ceasefire raised questions from the Opposition.
- Gaurav Gogoi demanded answers on India’s Pakistan policy.
- Rajnath Singh claimed the objectives were fully achieved.
- Tensions over the Bihar SIR exercise also added fuel to the fire.
Conclusion
The Operation Sindoor debate is no longer just about defense policy—it’s about national pride, political messaging, and electoral positioning. As Parliament continues to deliberate, the larger question lingers: In the battle between force and diplomacy, which side will define India’s future security doctrine?