According to Tharoor, the residents had received prior notice before the demolition. He stressed that portraying the issue as a political controversy based solely on the economic status of the affected people was unjust.
The Congress leader’s remarks aim to clarify the legal and safety rationale behind the Karnataka government’s action, countering criticism that the drive was unnecessarily harsh.
Legal and Safety Considerations
Officials noted that the demolished area was contaminated with toxic waste, posing health risks to those living there. Tharoor emphasized that public safety concerns, combined with government ownership of the land, justified the action.
He also noted that alternative housing solutions and compensation had been discussed with the affected residents, ensuring adherence to legal and ethical norms.
Political Reactions and Public Perception
The demolition drive triggered criticism from some party members and civil society groups, highlighting tensions between governance and public sentiment. Tharoor’s statements aim to underscore that the decision was based on legality and safety rather than political motivations.
Looking Ahead
While the demolition has stirred debate, Tharoor’s defense positions the action as a necessary step in enforcing the rule of law and ensuring citizen safety. Moving forward, both the state government and civic authorities are expected to continue engaging with residents to balance enforcement with rehabilitation and compensation.