New Delhi, January 8, 2025
The Supreme Court of India has ruled out the possibility of fresh counselling sessions for NEET PG 2024 candidates, indicating that the existing process will continue without significant changes. The verdict is expected to bring clarity to thousands of medical aspirants caught in a legal battle over the transparency and fairness of the examination and counselling process.
Background of the Case
The controversy surrounding NEET PG 2024 began with the exam conducted in August 2024. Allegations of irregularities, including last-minute changes to the exam format, prompted candidates to challenge the process in court. A key demand from petitioners was the release of answer keys and question papers to ensure greater transparency.
The case gained momentum in September 2024 when a group of 19 candidates filed a petition with the Supreme Court, questioning the use of the normalisation method to calculate results in the newly introduced two-shift examination format. The petitioners argued that the format change violated the guidelines set by the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS).
Timeline of Events
1. September 11, 2024: The Supreme Court asked NBEMS to respond to the petitioners’ claims of irregularities and lack of transparency.
2. September 20, 2024: The court expressed concern over the sudden shift to a two-session exam format, calling it unprecedented and potentially unfair.
3. September-December 2024: Multiple hearing delays and scheduling conflicts left the case unresolved, causing disruptions in the NEET PG 2024 counselling process. Several states, including Telangana, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, reported stalled admissions.
Supreme Court’s Latest Observations
On January 7, 2025, the Supreme Court bench led by Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih deferred the final hearing to January 8, stating that it could not accommodate the matter due to other ongoing proceedings. Addressing the petitioners’ counsel, Justice Gavai remarked, “If counselling is over, we will dispose of the matter. It’s not like we will order fresh counselling.”
The bench’s statement indicates that the court is unlikely to intervene in the ongoing counselling process or mandate a repeat of earlier sessions.
Candidates’ Demands and Impacts
Petitioners have consistently called for reforms, including the publication of raw scores, answer keys, and a more transparent normalisation process. Many have also expressed concerns over administrative lapses, including allegations of question paper leaks and delayed results.
The prolonged legal battle has left many candidates in limbo, with counselling already in its third phase. Aspirants across the country have urged the authorities to address systemic flaws in the examination process to prevent future controversies.
Outcome Awaited
The court’s final order, expected later today, will determine whether any reforms or compensatory measures will be introduced. However, the bench’s earlier remarks suggest that significant changes to the existing counselling process are unlikely.
Stay tuned for updates on this developing story.
